Condoleezza Rice to testify
03.30.04
Washington - The dramatic about-face on the two questions came in a letter
to the bipartisan panel that said Condoleezza Rice would appear in public if
it was agreed it would not set a precedent under the constitutional separation
of executive and legislative powers.
The move was a stunning reversal for the White House, which after initially resisting creation of the commission, had adamantly refused to allow Rice to testify in public and said Bush would speak only to Kean and Hamilton instead of all 10 members -- five Republicans and five Democrats.
See the letter from White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales below regarding the White House's decision to let National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice testify before the Sept. 11 commission.
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
March 30, 2004
Thomas H. Kean, Chairman
Lee H. Hamilton, Vice Chairman
National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States
Dear Chairman Kean and Vice Chairman Hamilton:
As we discussed last night, the President is prepared, subject to the conditions
set forth below, to agree to the request of the National Commission on Terrorist
Attacks Upon the United States for public testimony, under oath, by the Assistant
to the President for National Security Affairs, Dr. Condoleezza Rice.
The President has consistently stated a policy of strong support for the Commission
and instructed the Executive Branch to provide unprecedented and extraordinary
access to the Commission. To my knowledge, the Executive Branch has provided
access to documents or information in response to each of the requests issued
by the Commission to date, including many highly classified and extremely sensitive
documents that have seldom, if ever, been made available outside the Executive
Branch,
As an additional accommodation, the Executive Office of the President has made
available more than 20 EOP officials, including the National Security Advisor,
for private meetings with the Commission. As you know, based on principles
underlying the Constitutional separation of powers, Presidents of both parties
have long taken the position that White House advisors and staff are not subject
to the jurisdiction of legislative bodies and do not provide testimony -- even
on a voluntary basis -- on policy matters discussed within the White House
or advice given to the President. Indeed, I am not aware of any instance of
a sitting National Security Advisor testifying in public to a legislative body
(such as the Commission) concerning policy matters.
We continue to believe, as I advised you by letter dated March 25, 2004, that
the principles underlying the Constitutional separation of powers counsel strongly
against such public testimony, and that Dr. Rice's testimony before the Commission
can occur only with recognition that the events of September 11, 2001 present
the most extraordinary and unique circumstances, and with conditions and assurances
designed to limit harm to the ability of future Presidents to receive candid
advice.
Nevertheless, the President recognizes the truly unique and extraordinary circumstances
underlying the Commission's responsibility to prepare a detailed report on
the facts and circumstances of the horrific attacks on September 11, 2001.
Furthermore, we have now received assurances from the Speaker of the House
and the Majority Leader of the Senate that, in their view, Dr. Rice's public
testimony in connection with the extraordinary events of September 11, 2001
does not set, and should not be cited as, a precedent for future requests for
a National Security Advisor or any other White House official to testify before
a legislative body.
In light of the unique nature of the Commission and these additional assurances,
the President has determined that, although he retains the legal authority
to decline to make Dr. Rice available to testify in public, he will agree,
as a matter of comity and subject to the conditions set forth below, to the
Commission's request for Dr. Rice to testify publicly regarding matters within
the Commission's statutory mandate.
The necessary conditions are [as] follows. First, the Commission must agree
in writing that Dr. Rice's testimony before the Commission does not set any
precedent for future Commission requests, or requests in any other context,
for testimony by a National Security Advisor or any other White House official.
Second, the Commission must agree in writing that it will not request additional
public testimony from any White House official, including Dr. Rice. The National
Security Advisor is uniquely situated to provide the Commission with information
necessary to fulfill its statutory mandate. Indeed, it is for this reason that
Dr. Rice privately met with the Commission for more than four hours on February
7, fully answered every question posed to her, and offered additional private
meetings as necessary. Despite the fact that the Commission will therefore
have access to all information of which Dr. Rice is aware, the Commission has
nevertheless urged that public confidence in the work of the Commission would
be enhanced by Dr. Rice appearing publicly before the Commission. Other White
House officials with information relevant to the Commission's inquiry do not
come within the scope of the Commission's rationale for seeking public testimony
from Dr. Rice. These officials will continue to provide the Commission with
information through private meetings, briefings, and documents, consistent
with our previous practice.
I greatly appreciate the strong support you expressed to me last night for
an agreement to the conditions on which we are proposing this extraordinary
accommodation and your commitment to strongly advocate for the full support
of the Commission. If the Commission accepts the terms of this agreement, I
hope that we can schedule a time as soon as possible for such a public appearance
by Dr. Rice. I want to reiterate once again, however, that Dr. Rice would be
made available to the Commission with due regard for the Constitutional separation
of powers and reserving all legal authorities, privileges, and objections that
may apply, including with respect to other governmental entities or private
parties.
I would also like to take this occasion to offer an accommodation on another
issue on which we have not yet reached an agreement -- Commission access to
the President and Vice President. I am authorized to advise you that the President
and Vice President have agreed to one joint private session with all 10 Commissioners,
with one Commission staff member present to take notes of the session.
I look forward to continuing to work with the Commission to help it obtain
the information it needs to fulfill its statutory mandate.
Sincerely,
Alberto Gonzales
Counsel to the President