| Protesters: Keep THAP aid for HIV
By JEFF TESTERMAN, Times Staff Writer © St. Petersburg Times
published April 30, 2002
TAMPA -- A handful of protesters rallied Monday against an expected
move by the county to cut funding for HIV programs run by the
troubled Tampa-Hillsborough Action Plan.
The county has annually allocated about $900,000 in federal
aid to THAP for housing, transportation and case management assistance
for some 800 residents with HIV. But after the nonprofit agency
became embroiled in two federal investigations and missed deadlines
to submit audits, the county decided to rebid the HIV contracts.
Protesters with placards at the county building said they were
upset the contracts will likely be taken from THAP, which has
a minority board, and diverted to agencies not specifically run
by or for blacks and Hispanics.
"I don't think another agency can deal with minority problems
as well," said Jerome Clark, 44, a THAP client and one of the
protest organizers. "THAP has been like a family to me in helping
to deal with this struggle."
In March, Hillsborough commissioners agreed to continue funding
with THAP on a monthly basis to assure no interruption of service
to HIV clients. But the county staff has recommended other providers
get most of the contracts beginning in May or June.
Michael Ruppal, a THAP official who oversees a 32-unit rental
complex for people affected by HIV, said some clients see the
funding change as a white vs. black issue.
"Only THAP will go into certain ZIP codes for outreach because
the neighborhoods are too tough," he said. "I do see people who
are taking this (funding change) very hard and see it in racial
terms."
But Commissioner Ronda Storms, singled out by the protest group
as racially insensitive, denied the county's actions were racially
motivated.
"The bottom line is that there are other organizations that
can meet the contracts, and it doesn't have anything to do with
being minority," Storms said. "We cannot jeopardize our federal
funding by giving contracts to a nonprofit that does not meet
contractual obligations with audit requirements."
|